The idea of being able to produce vaccines at the point of care with the push of a button may sound futuristic, but Codex DNA Inc. claims it will have the first fully automated, tabletop vaccine printer ready for the market in 18-24 months. Will this be a game-changer in rolling out a COVID-19 vaccine? Probably not. But the technology could better position health officials to respond to the next pandemic, or eventually to produce a better, faster influenza vaccine each year.
With a potential COVID-19 vaccine moving closer to reality and the U.S government signing contracts for millions of potential doses, an unresolved question is who should be at the front of the line to get those first doses.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) capped off the month of August 2020 with one of the more significant Medicare coverage documents in recent memory. The more immediately impactful part of the proposed rule would offer immediate coverage for devices approved or cleared under the FDA’s breakthrough devices program, but the broader element of this proposed rule offers a definition for the term “reasonable and necessary,” a development that itself constitutes a breakthrough in the world of Medicare coverage of medical technology.
In a bid to build public confidence and demonstrate its transparency in determinations about potential COVID-19 vaccines, the FDA will convene its Vaccine Advisory Committee for a virtual meeting Oct. 22 to discuss the general development of the vaccines for the U.S. market.
The Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) has invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, a mechanism designed to ensure the privacy of EU citizens’ data when conveyed to other nations in a manner consistent with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Makers of drugs and devices are not without recourse in transferring patient data to the U.S. for clinical trials conducted in Europe, but industry must revisit their standard contractual clauses to ensure those protocols provide the necessary privacy provisions, or face fines that could amount to tens of millions of euros.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) unveiled two interim final rules intended to deal with enforcement activities in connection with policies enunciated over the past four years, including the so-called Brand memo, which banned federal prosecutors from using federal agency guidance as leverage in prosecutions of private-sector entities.
“Maybe this is not their final offer and maybe they’re not digging as deep as they perhaps could or should,” Michael Abrams, managing partner and co-founder of Numerof & Associates, said of the biopharma industry’s counteroffer to U.S. President Donald Trump on drug pricing. But the offer “is not inconsequential,” he told BioWorld, noting that it reportedly could deliver $100 billion in savings over 10 years. The proposal also offers the president the opportunity to say he delivered on his promise to lower prescription drug prices as he campaigns for re-election, whereas his threatened executive order granting Medicare and other federal programs “most favorable nation pricing” for prescription drugs would still be in the rulemaking process when voters head to the polls or their mailboxes in November.
The U.S. FDA has given the green light to a new type of treatment to help smokers quit, clearing the way for the first time the use of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (Deep TMS) for short-term smoking cessation in adults.
The truth that every action has a reaction is being proven again in the public square of the U.S. as the shrill, endless clamor of politicians hoping to score against their opponents via health care issues or accomplishments threatens to undermine confidence in the FDA, the products it approves and even the guidance offered by the Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC). In the past, politicians from both parties blamed “greedy” biopharma companies and self-appointed social influencers for patients refusing to fill prescriptions, get tested or be immunized. Now they have themselves to blame.
Medical device cybersecurity seems to have taken a back seat to the COVID-19 pandemic, but a new internet connection protocol vulnerability has been identified that affects health care along with a wide range of other industries.