The Biosecure Act passed its first milestone in the U.S. House May 15 when the Oversight Committee voted 40-1 to favorably report the bill to the full House for a vote. Under the act, H.R. 8333, federal agencies would be prohibited from procuring biotechnology equipment or services from a “biotechnology company of concern” and from contracting, either directly or through a subcontract, with anyone that would use such equipment or services to perform the contract.
The FTC’s request for a nearly 25% increase in funding for fiscal 2025 was splashed with cold water May 15 in a U.S. House Appropriations subcommittee hearing. That’s “a dramatic increase in funding for an agency whose work continues to raise concerns among many members of Congress and the public,” Rep. David Joyce (R-Ohio), chair of the Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government, said as he opened the hearing.
As it gets fine-tuned, the Biosecure Act is becoming more than just a topic of conversation in the halls and meeting rooms of the U.S. Capitol. Reps. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) and Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) formally introduced a new version of the Biosecure Act in the House May 10 as a defense against China’s national security laws requiring all Chinese firms to share any requested data with the Chinese Communist Party, including biotechnology companies that collect, test and store American genomic data.
Is the U.S. getting the best return on investment (ROI) for its NIH buck? That’s the basic question at the heart of a white paper Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) issued May 9 to continue a conversation he started in September on the reforms needed at the country’s premier biomedical research institution.
By now, the story of last year’s dismal U.S. capital markets is hardly news. But when combined with increasing regulatory stresses, especially for biopharma and med-tech startups, there are elements of that story giving some Street-watchers pause, even as the market begins to show a few signs of recovery.
Having addressed the manufacturing issues that resulted in a few complete response letters, Alvotech Holdings SA and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.’s biosimilars partnership is now on a roll, with the U.S. FDA approving the team’s second biosimilar, Selarsdi, less than two months after approving the first one, Simlandi, as an adalimumab interchangeable.
Before formally introducing legislation to spur R&D of treatments for long COVID, the U.S. Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee is calling for stakeholder input on the proposal that would require $10 billion in dedicated, mandatory NIH funding to respond to the chronic condition over the next 10 years.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was quite vocal in its statement regarding a recent hospital cybersecurity breach, but HHS recently suffered an undisclosed data breach that cost $7.5 million in taxpayer monies.
When it comes to whether Medicare Part D should cover the new anti-obesity drugs, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and lawmakers may be caught between the math and public pressure.
Although there’s bipartisan interest in the U.S. Congress to hold pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) accountable for their contribution to the costliest drug prices in the world, the Biden administration ignored PBMs when it again focused on drug companies as the bad guys of pricing in its proposed 2025 budget.
RSS
