The U.S. national coverage analysis for transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement drew support from cardiologists and device makers alike, but the Medical Device Manufacturers Association is urging CMS to plan ahead in its final coverage memo and consider the coverage needs outside the confines of the existing U.S. FDA-approved device.

Site neutral payments under the U.S. Medicare program have been contentious for some time, and Congress seems poised to act on the issue in 2025. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission is wary of making any recommendations as yet — a position that MedPAC may hold pending the collection of additional data.

Medicare Advantage plans have drawn criticism for deviating somewhat from Medicare coverage policies, a question CMS took up in a recent draft rule. In comments to the docket, the Medical Device Manufacturers Association said it sees a need to throw a lasso around such practices, alleging that they may result in beneficiaries receiving more limited coverage than they would in fee-for-service care.

The Medicare coverage story of the Cardiomems device has a Homeric air about it, spanning nearly a decade starting with an adverse local coverage determination in 2016. Abbott Park, Ill.-based Abbott Laboratories finally brought the story full circle with a successful national coverage determination that gives the device nationwide coverage for Medicare patients without the need to wrangle with Medicare administrative contractors.

The discussion about taxpayer appropriations for CMS has been ongoing for decades, leading to futile speculation regarding user fees for the agency. Louis Jacques, who formerly worked at CMS, told BioWorld that Congress tends to be somewhat reactive when it comes to appropriations for CMS – a dynamic which suggests that appropriations for CMS are not likely to improve significantly in the near term.

Administrators at the U.S. Medicare program have proposed to cover the Cardiomems remote monitoring device for heart failure, but cardiologists are averse to several of the conditions spelled out in the draft coverage memo, including what they see as a somewhat futile demand for a comparator arm in the proposed coverage study.

Medicare coverage of FDA-designated breakthrough devices is still a policy hot topic. Although the House of Representatives generated some momentum on related legislation, the Senate is now examining the Ensuring Patient Access to Critical Breakthrough Products Act for potential passage in the lame duck session – a development that would draw enthusiastic cheers from industry.

Makers of devices and diagnostics face a new set of policy questions following the 2024 U.S. general elections, but many of the impending changes at the executive branch seem directed more toward drugs and vaccines, seemingly leaving the device and diagnostics industries largely out of harm’s way.

While the inpatient and outpatient final rules for 2025 are baked into the U.S. Medicare payment system, there are indications that Congress will consider legislation that would flatten rates across sites of service.