It appears the U.S. FDA believes it’s never a bad time to release regulatory information about devices granted market access via the de novo program. The agency recently posted information on the vintage de novo granted in 2018 to Imagen Technologies Inc. for the company’s Osteo Detect algorithm.
Medicare Advantage plans have been controversial for several reasons, and the Advanced Medical Technology Association has now made the argument that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services should require these plans to replicate the terms of the Medicare new technology add-on program.
The U.K. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency is reminding industry that several new regulatory requirements are in effect as of June 16, 2025, such as a postmarket surveillance rule that says manufacturers have only 15 days to report serious incidents to the agency.
The bankruptcy of genetic testing service 23andme Holding Corp. prompted a reaction from many quarters, but a June 11 Senate hearing highlighted an interest in federal privacy legislation that would be directed toward genetic privacy as well as comprehensive and preemptive federal privacy legislation.
The bankruptcy of genetic testing service 23andme Holding Corp. prompted a reaction from many quarters, but a June 11 Senate hearing highlighted an interest in federal privacy legislation that would be directed toward genetic privacy as well as comprehensive and preemptive federal privacy legislation.
The U.K.’s National Health Service reported June 10 that patients in the U.K. will be the first in Europe to enjoy the benefits of the Edison ultrasound histotripsy for ablation of liver cancer tumors as part of an effort to bring products to market more quickly to deal with unmet needs.
London-based Livanova plc. has petitioned the U.S. CMS to cover vagus nerve stimulation device for treatment-resistant depression without the need for a clinical trial — a change that would eliminate the costly and cumbersome coverage with evidence development mechanism.
Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration initiated court proceedings against Philips Electronics Australia Ltd. over sound abatement foam used in CPAP machines marketed under the Respironics brand.
