The U.S. FDA’s advisory hearing on multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests suggests that the premarket requirements for these tests will be rigorous, if only because the agency stated at the outset of the hearing that it sees these tests as class III devices. However, the advisory committee also suggested that a registry be established to track outcomes for these tests, a requirement that is likely to prove expensive and time-consuming to fulfill.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission announced Nov. 21 that it has obtained a civil monetary penalty in the amount of $700,000 from CRI Genetics LLC, an enforcement action taken under the agency’s policy for biometrics information.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is clearly a more activist agency of late, although much of that activism has been around mergers and acquisitions. The latest FTC move, however, deals with investigative authorities that will be applied toward artificial intelligence (AI), which Katie Bond of Keller & Heckerman LLP said will give the agency considerable powers of discovery regardless of the merits of the enforcement action.
The U.S. FDA advises health care providers (HCPs) to avoid using Monoject syringes distributed by Cardinal Health with syringe pumps or patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps because of incompatibilities between the Monoject interface and the pumps.
The U.S. FDA’s predetermined change control program (PCCP) is the talk of the med-tech town, but this novel regulatory mechanism has its limitations, said Cassie Scherer, senior director for digital health policy at Medtronic plc.
The renal denervation hypothesis of hypertension was initially viewed with some skepticism, and Dublin-based Medtronic plc. endured a major setback when clinical trial data failed to make a compelling case for approval for the Symplicity Spyral. However, the company finally landed an FDA approval for the device, opening the gates to a new and significant market opportunity even with competition already on the market.
Janet Woodcock, one of the longer-tenured U.S. FDA center directors in the agency’s history, is set to retire sometime in 2024, although the exact date has not been set.
The medical device industry might at times believe that it is the sole focus of the U.S. federal government thinking about cybersecurity, but the FDA is hardly alone in leaning hard on industry to stand up a solid cybersecurity regime. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also turning the screws on corporate America regarding cybersecurity as seen in enforcement against Solarwinds Corp., an enforcement action that Seth Carmody of Medcrypt Inc., said highlights the breadth of regulatory hazards for the med-tech industry.
Medical device companies and trade associations alike have been clamoring for some time for a leaner path to Medicare coverage for their more novel product offerings, a message that may be gaining traction.
The U.S. FDA’s approach to bias covers a large swath of territory, including the potential for bias to creep invisibly into artificial intelligence (AI) products. Yarmela Pavlovic, vice president for global regulatory affairs at Medtronic plc, said at this year’s Artificial Intelligence Summit that regulators may be more wary of the potential hazards of bias in AI compared to non-AI software simply because of the difficulty in anticipating how bias might affect the function of these advanced algorithms.
