The medical device industry might at times believe that it is the sole focus of the U.S. federal government thinking about cybersecurity, but the FDA is hardly alone in leaning hard on industry to stand up a solid cybersecurity regime. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also turning the screws on corporate America regarding cybersecurity as seen in enforcement against Solarwinds Corp., an enforcement action that Seth Carmody of Medcrypt Inc., said highlights the breadth of regulatory hazards for the med-tech industry.

The artificial intelligence (AI) space doesn’t exactly lack for stakeholders, but the roster of stakeholders in the U.S. is poised to grow by hundreds of millions, according to Laura Adams, senior advisor at the U.S. National Academy of Medicine.

The America Invents Act of 2011 was designed to provide a durable overhaul of the U.S. patent system, but the inter partes review process has drawn fire from inventors as a patent-killing machine.

In the following years, 2023 may come to be seen in medical device circles as the year of artificial intelligence (AI), but that doesn’t mean that 2023 will be seen as the year of regulatory clarity for AI.

Olympus Corp., of Center Valley, Pa., reported Nov. 9 a voluntary field corrective action for bronchoscopes prompted by complaints of endobronchial combustion during procedures that involve the use of high-frequency (HF) therapy equipment.

The America Invents Act of 2011 was designed to provide a durable overhaul of the U.S. patent system, but the inter partes review process has drawn fire from inventors as a patent-killing machine. The Senate is considering a new bill to address some of these concerns, but witnesses at a hearing this week were anything but united in their assessment of the status quo, making it difficult to forecast the fate of this latest effort at patent reform.