The U.S. CMS said its Medicare administrative contractors withdrew a draft local coverage determination that would have restricted the use of surveillance testing for allograft rejection.

TGA opened a consultation for regulation of assistive technologies, a key element of which is to make determinations about the regulatory status of some of these products. While the agency makes clear that some items that are currently unregulated may soon be subject to regulation, one of the more innocuous-seeming articles that may fall under regulation is the common and seemingly innocuous wig.

The U.S. FDA’s draft guidance for predetermined change control protocols for all device types fills in a gap left by previous draft guidance, but there is one potential stopping point for class III devices.

The U.K. Medicines and Health Care Products Regulatory Agency enacted its AI Airlock program for artificial intelligence – the agency’s branding for its regulatory sandbox for this type of medical software.

The U.S. FDA’s effort to regulate lab-developed tests was predictably controversial, but the final rule drew a second lawsuit, this time from the Association for Molecular Pathology.

The New York Times published an article on Aug. 20 about potential conflicts of interest on the part of Jeff Shuren, former director of the Center for Devices & Radiological Health (CDRH), arguing that Shuren may have failed to recuse himself in matters in which his wife, a regulatory attorney, represented a medical device maker.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s report on FDA oversight of medical devices acknowledges that the agency has made strides in its efforts to develop surveillance systems to track adverse events, but there are shortcomings.

The COVID-19 pandemic drove a large volume of in vitro diagnostic test efforts toward the SARS-CoV-2 virus, such as the Biofire respiratory panel by Biofire Diagnostics LLC, of Salt Lake City, a test for which the U.S. FDA released the special controls.

Privacy legislation was passed and implemented in the European Union, but the picture in the U.S. is pockmarked by state legislation, a scenario that raises concerns about a fractured and impracticable compliance regime.

The World Health Organization has had its collective eye on mpox for some time now, but announced August 14 that the prevalence of the disease in Africa raises the epidemic to a public health emergency of international concern, a change in policy driven by the emergence of a novel strain of the pathogen.