• Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • BioWorld Asia
  • BioWorld Science
  • Data Snapshots
  • Special reports
Clarivate
  • Data Snapshots
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
  • Special reports
  • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
  • Trump administration impacts
  • Biopharma M&A scorecard
  • BioWorld 2024 review
  • BioWorld MedTech 2024 review
  • BioWorld Science 2024 review
  • Women's health
  • China's GLP-1 landscape
  • PFA re-energizes afib market
  • China CAR T
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Israel
  • Rise of obesity
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Biosimilars
  • Aging
  • IVDs on the rise
  • Coronavirus
  • Artificial intelligence

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

Clarivate
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • BioWorld Asia
  • BioWorld Science
  • Data Snapshots
    • BioWorld
    • BioWorld MedTech
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
  • Special reports
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Trump administration impacts
    • Biopharma M&A scorecard
    • BioWorld 2024 review
    • BioWorld MedTech 2024 review
    • BioWorld Science 2024 review
    • Women's health
    • China's GLP-1 landscape
    • PFA re-energizes afib market
    • China CAR T
    • Alzheimer's disease
    • Israel
    • Rise of obesity
    • Radiopharmaceuticals
    • Biosimilars
    • Aging
    • IVDs on the rise
    • Coronavirus
    • Artificial intelligence

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe
Home » Blogs » BioWorld MedTech Perspectives » Parallel review: Still not a big deal?

BioWorld MedTech Perspectives
BioWorld MedTech Perspectives RSS FeedRSS

BioWorld MedTech / CDRH / CMS / FDA / Medicare

Parallel review: Still not a big deal?

Oct. 11, 2011
By Mark McCarty

 

Well, FDA and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services are at it again with parallel review, but this time they've tacitly acknowledged what everyone knew all along; that it would never be willingly adopted by more than a very few device makers. In the Federal Register notice of Oct. 11, the two agencies state that the two-year pilot for parallel review won't accommodate more than five applications per year.

When FDA and CMS initially tried to drum up interest in the idea, a number of observers told me industry would never flock to the idea in any numbers greater than that. However, it's also worth pointing out that the timing for coverage analysis is no different under parallel review if a device maker can't apply for parallel review until the device appears at an advisory committee hearing. Ditto the timing of disclosure.

Another peculiarity is that the notice states that CMS will have the option of using coverage with evidence development as a potential reimbursement outcome in parallel review. No point in stopping the presses for that one, is there?

The net result is that you're probably safe if you bet the cost of your kid's braces that parallel review will never attract industry in droves. In fact, if you can find someone foolish enough to take that bet, by all means take it.

Fans of conspiracy theory might smell cost containment in parallel review. After all, the FR notice does not say CMS can't inject itself into the device approval process before that device goes to advisory. Furthermore, the two agencies signed an MOU in 2010 regarding data sharing that does nothing to limit CMS's use of FDA's data. What better way for CMS to get its camel's nose in the tent?

That last part is admittedly speculative, but what's the alternative explanation? “We just wanna know” isn't it. Does CMS want to help FDA foster innovation? Sure, that's it.

Think I'm paranoid? Then describe the net benefit to industry if parallel review is of little (or no) help to five or fewer applications each year. Let's not forget that relatively inexpensive510(k) devices are ineligible, or about all the budget pressure in Washington. If there's one mantra regarding Medicare these days in this town, it's “cut costs.”

Of course it's possible that this whole thing will fizzle and become nothing more than a curiosity for future generations of med-tech policy geeks. Or maybe the only place it'll fly is on that topsy-turvy mess known to comic book fans as Bizarro World. In that case I'll eat a plate of crow, preferably with a dollop of bearnaise, please.

Still, I have to ask: Could parallel review as a screening mechanism for those really expensive PMA devices take root in our normal, non-Bizarro little corner of the Universe, where we drive on the parkway and park on the driveway?

Not a chance. Right?

Popular Stories

  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld
    BioWorld briefs for May 23, 2025.
  • Today's news in brief

    BioWorld MedTech
    BioWorld MedTech briefs for May 23, 2025.
  • Brain with handshake and cityscape

    Vigil takeover brings TREM2 Alzheimer’s prospect to Sanofi

    BioWorld
    Sanofi SA made good on its plan to bear down on M&A by agreeing to buy Vigil Neuroscience Inc. for $8 per share (NASDAQ:VIGL). Included in the transaction is a...
  • News in brief

    BioWorld Asia
    BioWorld Asia briefs for May 20, 2025
  • Drug capsule and dollar sign

    Little bite from voluntary most-favored nation Rx pricing order

    BioWorld
    After a week of hype, the most-favored nation (MFN) drug pricing executive order (EO) U.S. President Donald Trump signed May 12 has a lot of bark but little bite,...
  • BioWorld
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld MedTech
    • Today's news
    • Clinical
    • Data Snapshots
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Opinion
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Asia
    • Today's news
    • Analysis and data insight
    • Australia
    • China
    • Clinical
    • Deals and M&A
    • Financings
    • Newco news
    • Regulatory
    • Science
  • BioWorld Science
    • Today's news
    • Biomarkers
    • Cancer
    • Conferences
    • Endocrine/Metabolic
    • Immune
    • Infection
    • Neurology/Psychiatric
    • Patents
  • More
    • About
    • Advertise with BioWorld
    • Archives
    • Article reprints and permissions
    • Contact us
    • Cookie policy
    • Copyright notice
    • Data methodology
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Podcasts
    • Privacy policy
    • Share your news with BioWorld
    • Staff
    • Terms of use
    • Topic alerts
Follow Us

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved. Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

Clarivate
  • BioWorld
  • BioWorld MedTech
  • BioWorld Asia
  • BioWorld Science
  • Data Snapshots
    • BioWorld
    • BioWorld MedTech
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
  • Special reports
    • Infographics: Dynamic digital data analysis
    • Trump administration impacts
    • Biopharma M&A scorecard
    • BioWorld 2024 review
    • BioWorld MedTech 2024 review
    • BioWorld Science 2024 review
    • Women's health
    • China's GLP-1 landscape
    • PFA re-energizes afib market
    • China CAR T
    • Alzheimer's disease
    • Israel
    • Rise of obesity
    • Radiopharmaceuticals
    • Biosimilars
    • Aging
    • IVDs on the rise
    • Coronavirus
    • Artificial intelligence

BioWorld. Link to homepage.

  • Sign In
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Subscribe