The Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technology (MCIT) rule is administratively a dead letter, but the U.S. House of Representatives’ Cures 2.0 legislation would statutorily resurrect the MCIT concept. Scott Whitaker, president and CEO of the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), said automatic coverage of breakthrough devices does not constitute a subversion of the Medicare coverage process, but added that AdvaMed is not opposed to other means of cutting the Medicare red tape, such as greater resources at CMS.
While the FDA has not provided transcriptions for device user fee meetings in roughly five months, the agency is still demonstrably determined to increase the volume of user fees. A source close to the negotiations told BioWorld that the latest proposal from the agency, dated Sept. 22, would require that industry come up with roughly $2.5 billion over the next five fiscal years, more than double the amount under MDUFA IV.
Physicians occasionally go over the line where Medicare services are concerned, but the U.S. Department of Justice announced Sept. 15 that a cardiologist in Orlando, Fla., went farther than the ordinary illicit billing.
Researchers have retrospectively divided more than 16,000 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations into four structure-based subgroups, and looked at how the members of each subgroup fared depending on which EGFR inhibitor they were given.
Sight Sciences Inc. may have visions of a substantial settlement following Ivantis Inc.’s $60 million settlement with Glaukos Corp. this week or the Menlo Park, Calif.-based company may have its sights set on knocking a competitor out of the market entirely. Both are possible outcomes of the suit Sight Sciences announced this morning that alleges infringement of four of its patents by Ivantis for its Hydrus Microstent. Sight Sciences makes the Omni surgical system, which competes with the Hydrus and the Glaukos Istent in the minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) space.
The FDA reported the elevation of its information technology (IT) office to an agency-level office, a move that gives the agency a heightened priority for eliminating some of the balkanization of computer systems.
Special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) have been making headlines recently in the life sciences, but these entities practice a business model that leaves some observers uneasy. Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), told a Senate committee recently that the risks to investors in SPACs has prompted him to ask his staff to come up with some proposals to increase transparency to investors, potentially leading to additional compliance costs for these entities.
After three years of litigation and nearly a decade of skirmishes, Ivantis Inc. settled with Glaukos Corp. for $60 million to be paid in two installments, with the first $30 million due by Dec. 31, 2021, and the second $30 million by Dec. 31, 2022. In addition, Irvine, Calif.-based Ivantis will pay Glaukos a 10% royalty through April 26, 2025, on sales of Ivantis’ Hydrus Microstent in the U.S. or international sales supplied out of the U.S. With just two weeks to go until their scheduled court date of Sept. 28, the companies finally saw eye-to-eye, reaching a cross-licensing agreement and hammering out a covenant to refrain from future litigation regarding the technologies involved in the Hydrus or Glaukos’s Istent, both used to treat glaucoma.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken a more assertive stance regarding enforcement of several considerations, most conspicuously about mergers and acquisitions. However, the agency’s push for less cumbersome processes has now been applied to a host of considerations pertinent to the life sciences, including bias found in artificial intelligence algorithms, abuse of drug patents, and repairs for medical equipment, a signal that more frequent and more rapid FTC enforcement is on the near horizon.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has withdrawn the rule for the Medicare Coverage of Innovative Technologies (MCIT) program, an action that predates the agency’s self-imposed deadline of December 2021 by three months. The agency cited some previously discussed issues with the rule, but the move was blasted by industry as thwarting the support of the majority of stakeholders.