Medicare coverage of medical software in the U.S. is generally not the subject of flattering remarks from industry, but the novelty of the subcategory of artificial intelligence (AI) would seem to suggest that the Medicare problem for AI is even more severe. That suspicion was borne out by consultant Bruce Quinn who said at a public meeting here in Washington that some areas of software coverage and reimbursement, including AI software, “are just a train wreck,” a problem he said is especially acute in fee-for-service care.
With two U.S. courts rejecting constitutional challenges to Medicare drug price negotiations, every company that had a drug selected for the first round of negotiations countered Medicare’s initial offer of what it considered a maximum fair price by the March 2 deadline, according to the Biden administration.
One down, eight to go. That’s the scorecard for the constitutional challenges to mandatory Medicare drug price negotiations now that a U.S. federal court has dismissed a suit filed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the National Infusion Center Association and the Global Colon Cancer Association.
Newly approved gene therapies targeting sickle cell disease will be the first focus of the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Cell and Gene Therapy Access Model, the agency said Jan. 30.
U.S. physicians who provide radiation services for cancer patients have a long-running feud with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services over a series of payment rate cuts for their services, but these medical societies are now teaming up to address the issue. These medical societies are making the case that payment reform is not only critical for the future of radiation oncology but are also optimistic that congressional interest in the dilemma has quickened sufficiently to suggest that a congressional response may be on tap in 2024.
The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the final rule for data interoperability and prior authorization (PA) for health plans, which is designed in part to improve the PA process used by payers.
Intravascular ultrasound is the preferred imaging modality for a number of procedures conducted on the circulatory system, including some procedures performed in the peripheral vasculature, but adoption is seen in some quarters as sub-optimal. A trio of medical journals have published a consensus statement pressing the case for more widespread utilization of IVUS for peripheral artery disease, but one of the sources of drag is poor Medicare reimbursement, a problem that might only be resolved in a piecemeal fashion.
Of all that happened in 2023, Medicare price negotiations probably top the list as the biggest U.S. biopharma disruptor. Although Congress cleared the way for the negotiations last year when it passed the partisan Inflation Reduction Act, they weren’t fleshed out until this year when the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued guidance detailing the rules of the negotiating road. And as usual, the devil is in the details.
Biosimilars grabbed a lot of headlines in 2023, thanks to the biggest U.S. biosimilar launch to date targeting Abbvie Inc.’s mega-blockbuster Humira (adalimumab). Eight biosimilars referencing the immunology drug entered the U.S. market under licensing agreements with Abbvie. Amgen Inc.’s Amjevita led the pack with a five-month headstart in January. The others – including the first adalimumab interchangeable, Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH’s Cyltezo – launched in July.
In another step that blurs the distinction between biosimilars and interchangeables, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is proposing a rule to give Medicare Part D plans more flexibility to substitute biosimilars for the reference biologics so Medicare beneficiaries can have timelier access to the lower-cost drugs. The rule would permit the plans to treat the biosimilar substitutions as “maintenance changes” that don’t require prior Medicare approval. Such changes would enable the substitutions to apply to all enrollees – and not just those who begin the therapy after the effective date of the change.