The U.S. FDA literally wasted no time in posting twin warning letters to two companies in China that manufacture syringes that were the subjects of multiple recalls in the U.S.
The U.S. FDA cited Criticare Technologies Inc. for significant lapses in the company’s corrective and preventive action procedures, which suggests a need for outside certification of compliance because this problem was also observed in a warning letter from 2017.
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has provided updated guidance on the question of patent subject matter eligibility for inventions that rely on artificial intelligence, stating that a patent claim that does little more than recite an abstract idea is not subject-matter eligible.
Royalties for licensed patents ordinarily need not be paid after the underlying patent has expired, but the case of Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. v. Insall would seem to throw out a cautionary flag regarding such agreements.
As the U.S. Congress continues to pass laws that require federal agencies to issue rules to implement new statutory provisions, a group of lawmakers is reminding the agencies that it will be looking over their shoulders to ensure they don’t stray beyond the scope of the law or overstep their authority.
The U.S. FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health has rewired its organizational structure on several fronts, including a promotion of its communication function into a “super office,” which the agency said will help it be more agile and responsive to its strategic priorities.
The coverage with evidence development (CED) process employed by the U.S. Medicare program may suffer from underutilization, but the authors of a new article in Value in Health see the attendant problems as administrative in nature. The issues include, but are not limited to, a lack of predictability as to when a CED study would be required for coverage of a medical device.
The U.S. House Committee on Ways and Means held a field hearing in the State of Utah, during which committee chairman Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), highlighted the need to continue to incentivize life science research in the U.S. Smith remarked that Republican members of the committee have formed “tax teams” to find ways that the tax code can be tweaked to “better incentivize research and development here in the U.S.,” another sign that the well-being of life science commerce is seen as a macroeconomic imperative in Washington.
Guardant Health Inc.agreed to pay more than $900,000 to settle allegations that the company’s human resources office hired a relative and a friend of a physician who persuaded the company to make the hires in a quid pro quo for orders of Guardant’s tests. The U.S. Department of Justice said the penalties could have been much greater but for the company’s cooperation in the investigation, which disclosed that at least one of these hires was not qualified for the position.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has upheld a district court decision that Natera Inc. is entitled to an injunction of a Neogenomics Inc. assay for detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This outcome serves as a sobering reminder that injunction can be obtained at the preliminary injunction stage by demonstrating that an effort to prove infringement is likely to succeed even in the absence of a thorough evaluation of the contested claims in that patent.
RSS
